Moralize.us alpha 
Is it right or wrong for you to edit Wikipedia to put up some wrong info for fun?
put your masturbation pictures from when you were 15 up online (and where) ?
ask if it is right or wrong to you and not if it is right for us, all people ... ? ?
wrong yes, it's funny, but only fr you, not for the readers
wrong there's enough people doing that already. wikitruth.org! citizendium.org!
wrong I agree that information should be free, messing with wikipedia entries lowers the avaliability of publically accessable true and free information, its just like pissing in the pool, it makes everyones lives less rich soley so that you can be an ass
right For teh lulz
right it teaches people to check the source
wrong the integrity of our information is critical for the stability and progress of mankind
right Wikipedia isn't trustworthy anyway
right it's their fault for not instituting a technological block for such fun activity.
wrong it's just obnoxious.
wrong Wikipedia is a free tool for sharing human knowledge...why would you pollute it?
right lulz will be had
wrong This is a website. You are the fluid. You can be any type of fluid. But a pile of shit is not fluid, and blocks the flow. Then (Wikipedia admins) have to clean up your shit. Get it?
wrong uncyclopedia is for that
wrong people use it for references.
right LULZ, the goal for any internet action.
wrong having fun at the expense of others, no matter how enjoyable, is wrong.
right It encourages critical thought and discourages uncritical acceptance of written text.
right because it's an option that wiki developers or whoever left open in the wiki structure, and anyone reading wiki is aware of it. People generally should trust info from Internet less
wrong Wikipedia is for have information, not for fun
right it's the purpose of anonymous editing
wrong it undermines the work others have put into making the project reliable
right but changes erased quickly, so no fun
wrong and lame, grow up and get laid for the first time...
wrong we must NOT kid with the science
wrong it is people like you that make others believe that Wikipedia is an unreliable resource.
wrong if i can do the same?
wrong you must show respect to a public project
wrong Collaborating and sharing informations can be a valualbe resource for everybody, but it needs responsibility!
wrong crazy spammers
34% 66%
Please join and share whether or not this is right for you. (email not required)