Moralize.us alpha 
Is it right or wrong for you to bomb the outposts of a country that could possibly attack your country?
bomb an entire country of men, women, and children because of the actions of their leader ?
poison the crops of a country that exports lethal substances to your country ?
leave your country to avoid legal problems ?
send weapons to a country you know is engaging in genocide ?
wrong nonviolent politics is the only way to cause lasting change.
wrong preemptive attack on another country is never justified
wrong any country could possibly attack any country. Should we wipe out the whole civilization? Besides, doesn't attacking a country by this definition give them the right to attack your country first?
wrong if this were enough grounds for bombing another country, I would be left justified bombing all countries, as all countries could possibly attack mine.
right can save millions of lives.
wrong "could" "possibly" "maybe" "someday" attack?
wrong Because attacking a country that could potentially attack you would more than likely CAUSE that other country to attack you.
wrong attacking another country on the basis of what they MIGHT do, instead of on the basis of them attacking you first, is stupid and wasteful.
right outposts are unnecessary if conflict wont happen
right I'm against beeing the first to atack but in favor of defencing my country
30% 70%
Please join and share whether or not this is right for you. (email not required)